<h3>
Question-</h3>
Fill in the blanks.
<h3>
Answer-</h3>
Tense of the verb tells <u>when(</u><u>time </u><u>of </u><u>an </u><u>action</u><u>)</u> an action is done. There are three tenses of the verbs: <u>past</u> tense, <u>present</u> tense, and the <u>future</u> tense. Past tense tells about actions that happened in <u>the </u>past. <u>“</u><u>W</u><u>a</u><u>s</u><u>”</u> or <u>“</u><u>w</u><u>e</u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u>”</u> are added <u>before </u><u>the </u><u>main </u><u>verbs</u> to change it in past tense. Present tense tells about actions that are <u>currently</u><u> </u><u>happening in the </u><u>present</u>(did some changes to the question). We add <u>“</u><u>i</u><u>s</u><u>”</u> or <u>“</u><u>a</u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u>”</u> to change the verb into present tense. Future tense tells about actions that <u>will </u><u>happen</u><u> </u><u>in </u><u>the </u><u>future</u>. Adding <u>“</u><u>will”</u> or <u>“</u><u>s</u><u>h</u><u>a</u><u>l</u><u>l</u><u>”</u> to the verb will change it in future tense.
→I did some minor changes to the question too, you can check.
This is True. If you are referring to an author about whom you had previously written in the paragraph, you are allowed to omit the name from the parentheses.
Sun is the word from the passage which symbolizes hope.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
Wreckage, Inlet, and skeletons are definitely not the words that symbolizes hope. When the author says, ‘Finally, some of the storm clouds parted just as they were losing hope, and the sun shined down on the island’, he means that amidst the destroyed ships and stinky skeletons, when they were about to lose hope, there came a time when the clouds were clear and they could see a ray of hope.
That ray was the light of the sun, when everything seems like an end, that’s the time when the sun gave them aspiration. The rising sun symbolizes the new beginning and new hope, the setting sun also gives us a desire for a new day that will begin. So no matter whether the sun rises or sets, it will always be the symbol of hope.
to see a story about the person so chu see it in another way like how first person chu see the story from the person prospective now chu see others then the main characters
Answer:
C). Neither twin could die because they were immortal gods.
Explanation:
As per the details given in the excerpt, the most logical and reasonable claim would be that 'neither of the twins could die as they were perpetual gods.' This deduction can be substantiated through the details like <em>'died, but didn't die', '...still lives and reigns'</em> while the details like '<em>...lives in the Sky-World', 'content with the world..he helped to create..the world of men', 'rule the affairs of men'</em>, etc. suggest that they were immortal gods. Thus, these details not only support the above inference but forms the base of the conclusion. Hence, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.