Hueganots
hope this helped
Answer:
A. a president is more likely to appoint judges who would agree with him ideologically.
Explanation:
According to the Constitution, it is President who nominates judges for federal courts and the Supreme Court. After the nomination, it is Senate who appoint them based on informal criteria, as there's no criteria mentioned in the Constitution.
The most likely reason that appointment of judges by President is blocked is because the president is appointing judges who would agree with him ideologically. The Senate will block such nominations to ensure that judges who are appointed judge with justice and not under any influence from any political power.
Therefore, option A is correct.
<span>C) Committees of Correspondence. The Committees of Correspondence were meetings between Patriot leaders on the eve of the American Revolution. They acted as an informational pipeline through which the Colonies could air their greivances regarding the ever increasing regulations posed by the British Government and have that information sent into both rural and urban centers.</span>
They had seen that he was a good leader and they trusted him
