P(x) = 3x + 200
x=4 ⇒ p(4) = 3(4)+200=12+200=212
x=15 ⇒ p(15) = 3(15)+20=45+200=245
n(x) = 200(1.04)^x
x=4 ⇒ n(4) = 200 (1.04)^4 = 233.97
x=15⇒n(15)=200(1.04)^15 = 360.19
Then n(x) has the highest value in 4 years; n(x) has the highest value in 15 years
It is usually noted that correlation does not imply causation, but there are some correlations which are causation as well.
A correlation is when there is a relationship between two variables while causation is when the outcome of one variable affects the outcome of the other variable.
From the first option, though there may be a positive relationship between sales of jeans and sales of slacks, but the purchase of jeans does not mean that you have to purchase a slack, thus, there is no causation.
For the second option, though there may be positive relationship between <span>the number of aisles and the number of products in a supermarket, but a supermarket can have many aisles with few products, i.e. many aisles does not automatically imply many products, thus, there is no causation.
For the third option, though there may be a positive relationship between </span><span>the number of swimmers and the number of sunbathers at a beach, but all swimmers in a beach are not sunbathers and all sunbathers are not swimmers. Thus, a swimmer does not imply a sunbather and a sunbather does not imply a swimmer. Thus, there is no causation.
For the last option, it is generally known that the more you practice an activity, the better you get in that activity. Thus, there exist a relationship between </span><span>the number of hours spent practicing archery and the number of bull's-eyes an archer can hit and there also exist causation because the number of bull's-eye an archer can hit is directly dependent on the number of hours the archer spent practicing.
Therefore, the </span><span>correlation that is most likely a causation is </span><span>the positive correlation between the number of hours spent practicing archery and the number of bull's-eyes the archer can hit.</span>
1/10,000
Hope i helped
???????????????
Step-by-step explanation:
just take -4.5 the right side
If the denominator does not equal 0, the equivalent expression of 
is 
<h3>How to determine the equivalent expression?</h3>
The expression is given as:
Divide 14 by 7
Apply the law of indices
Evaluate the differences in the exponents
Hence, the equivalent expression of is
Read more about equivalent expressions at:
brainly.com/question/2972832
#SPJ4
