Answer:
<h3>The Brown v Board of Education case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.
</h3>
Explanation:
- The Brown v School of Education was a landmark case regarding public school segregation on the basis of race.
- Thurgood Marshall was the chief attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education. The plaintiff attorney ruled out that segregation policy violated the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
- The case won an unanimous verdict against school segregation.
- After the case was won, the Supreme Court outlawed the practice of segregation in any public institutions.
Unauthorized disclosure of Confidential information could be expected to jeopardise national security. Unauthorized disclosure of Secret information could have serious consequences for national security.
Tests for confidentiality determine whether unauthorised disclosure is possible. When performing confidentiality tests, you are attempting to determine whether data is being disclosed to people for whom it was not intended. Confidentiality testing ensures that authentication and encryption mechanisms function in accordance with security requirements. Proper authentication ensures that only authorised users can access the system and view the data.
To know more about Unauthorized disclosure here-
brainly.com/question/17198718
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the novel called The Monkey's Paw by W.W. Jacobs, during the chess game Mr. White wants to desperately beat his son so he grimly surveys the board, which indicates his greed as he does not care about his son but instead only cares about winning, much like he later on only wants the monkeys paw that no one else has and does not give much consideration to the consequences or those around him.
Gross domesticated product of GDP
The correct statement is that Sarah and Angelina Grimké sacrificed their ties to their former community for the sake of reform. So, the correct option is A.
Sarah and Angelina were reform activists being put under forced situation to cut their ties with their former community as they wanted to bring about a reform to the slavery system.
<h3>Reform Activists</h3>
- Sarah and Angelina were determined to end the slavery system that had existed in their region for a prolonged period of time. They had led to activism for ending women slavery.
- However, they belonged to a community which was primarily engaged in enslaving people, especially women. So, they were under a forced requirement to cut the ties with their community.
Hence, the correct option is A that Sarah and Angelina had to cut and sacrifice their ties to their former community in order to reform the activism of woman slavery.
Learn more about reform activists here:
brainly.com/question/9984406
