1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lostsunrise [7]
3 years ago
14

How did the desire for land change the world? eoupans looking for land in africa

History
1 answer:
kap26 [50]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

During this time, many European countries expanded their empires by aggressively establishing colonies in Africa so that they could exploit and export Africa's resources. Raw materials like rubber, timber, diamonds, and gold were found in Africa. Europeans also wanted to protect trade routes.

Explanation:

The European imperialist push into Africa was motivated by three main factors, economic, political, and social. It developed in the nineteenth century following the collapse of the profitability of the slave trade, its abolition and suppression, as well as the expansion of the European capitalist Industrial Revolution.

You might be interested in
Which best describes deforestation?
olasank [31]
The removal of a large area of trees for human use
4 0
3 years ago
What is the main cause today of civil strife in Sri Lanka?
qaws [65]
The main cause of the civil war and strife in Sri Lanka is their ethnic composition: Tamils in the north of the Island, who want independence and Sinhala in the South who want the country to remain united.

There is also a religious difference: the Tamils are predominantly Hindu and the Sinhalese are Buddhist. 
6 0
3 years ago
Which two beliefs were parts of Manifest Destiny?
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

Two beliefs were the expansion across the American continent was obvious, inevitable, and a divine right of the United States.

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Einhard was a member of Charlemagne’s court and described him as “my lord and foster-father”. He also wrote that, “no man can wr
Maurinko [17]

Answer:SINCE I have taken upon myself to narrate the public and private life, and no small part of the deeds, of my lord and foster-father, the most lent and most justly renowned King Charles, I have condensed the matter into as brief a form as possible. I have been careful not to omit any facts that could come to my knowledge, but at the same time not to offend by a prolix style those minds that despise everything modern, if one can possibly avoid offending by a new work men who seem to despise also the masterpieces of antiquity, the works of most learned and luminous writers. Very many of them, l have no doubt, are men devoted to a life of literary leisure, who feel that the affairs of the present generation ought not to be passed by, and who do not consider everything done today as unworthy of mention and deserving to be given over to silence and oblivion , but are nevertheless seduced by lust of immortality to celebrate the glorious deeds of other times by some sort of composition rather than to deprive posterity of the mention of their own names by not writing at all.

Be this as it may, I see no reason why I should refrain from entering upon a task of this kind, since no man can write with more accuracy than I of events that took place about me, and of facts concerning which I had personal knowledge, ocular demonstration as the saying goes, and I have no means of ascertaining whether or not any one else has the subject in hand.

In any event, I would rather commit my story to writing, and hand it down to posterity in partnership with others, so to speak, than to suffer the most glorious life of this most excellent king, the greatest of all the princes of his day, and his illustrious deeds, hard for men of later times to imitate, to be wrapped in the darkness of oblivion.

But there are still other reasons, neither unwarrantable nor insufficient, in my opinion, that urge me to write on this subject, namely, the care that King Charles bestowed upon me in my childhood, and my constant friendship with himself and his children after I took up my abode at court. In this way he strongly endeared me to himself, and made me greatly his debtor as well in death as in life, so that were I unmindful of the benefits conferred upon me, to keep silence concerning the most glorious and illustrious deeds of a man who claims so much at my hands, and suffer his life to lack due eulogy and written memorial, as if he had never lived, I should deservedly appear ungrateful, and be so considered, albeit my powers are feeble, scanty, next to nothing indeed, and not at all adapted to write and set forth a life that would tax the eloquence of a Tully [note: Tully is Marcus Tullius Cicero].

I submit the book. It contains the history of a very great and distinguished man; but there is nothing in it to wonder at besides his deeds, except the fact that I, who am a barbarian, and very little versed in the Roman language, seem to suppose myself capable of writing gracefully and respectably in Latin, and to carry my presumption so far as to disdain the sentiment that Cicero is said in the first book of the Tusculan Disputations to have expressed when speaking of the Latin authors. His words are: "It is an outrageous abuse both of time and literature for a man to commit his thoughts to writing without having the ability either to arrange them or elucidate them, or attract readers by some charm of style." This dictum of the famous orator might have deterred me from writing if I had not made up my mind that it was better to risk the opinions of the world, and put my little talents for composition to the test, than to slight the memory of so great a man for the sake of sparing myself.

Explanation:

did report made 93.6 plz mark brainist

4 0
3 years ago
50 POINTS PLEASE HELP
Komok [63]

Answer:

the did coms answ tics fords

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the significance of the camp david accords of 1979?
    11·2 answers
  • President James Monroe and President Theodore Roosevelt shared which of the following foreign policy viewpoints?
    6·2 answers
  • Question 8<br> Which of the following is not based on Latin? (4 points)
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following was Hitler s suggestion to the Soviet Union in regards to Asia?
    11·1 answer
  • How were Japanese-Americans treated during World War II?
    7·1 answer
  • The photograph shows a building destroyed by an earthquake in Mexico City in 1985. The Mexican people blamed scenes such as this
    13·2 answers
  • What was the Monroe Doctrine?
    13·2 answers
  • What did 54 40 of fight mean?
    5·1 answer
  • What were the characteristics of the modern corporation during the rise of big business?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the hundred-year war change European history?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!