<u>The story of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</u> is a mystery about the two friends Hyde and doctor Jekyll written by Robert Stevenson. It is a thriller and mystery drama investigated by the lawyer Utterson.
The line shows the conflict between the character vs. self.
<h3>The mystery novel can be explained as:</h3>
- The conflict is the obstruction of characters by other characters in success or development. In this excerpt, the conflict is between the lawyer and his perception about the other character Mr Hyde.
- The lawyer Utterson is a friend of doctor Jekyll and dislikes another character dear to the doctor named Mr Hyde.
- Siding with his conflict the lawyer agrees with the doctor to comply with his request and accepts the proposal with a sigh.
Therefore, it is character vs. self option c.
Learn more about The story of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde here:
brainly.com/question/12701725
Mia 's barrier to critical thinking is 4.<em>thinking that she is too smart</em>. She thinks herself to be that smart because of her intelligence performance- IQ- ; she has been evaluated with a much higher grade -145- than the average. As a consequence, she cannot understand - <em>she gets upset</em> - why she is asked to give an answer to her classmates' different or opposing ideas. She mistakes critical debates for questioning her intelligence; she thinks her 145 IQ is synonymous with the absolute truth.
1. Time is not correct because this is not a factor to be considered when debating critically.
2.lack of understanding. Mia undesrtands perfectly well the teacher's instructions. Her problem is not rational but emotional.
3.IQ philosophy. In fact, Mia 's intelligence has been measured using this IQ philosophy, but it is <em>her attitude</em> what works as a barrier for critical thinking.
You have to consider factors
It is allowed to set more
