Answer:
not make sense as long as Xenophobia had a comparative advantage in any good.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is when a country has a lower cost of production of a good compared to other countries. The country will be able to produce more than it needs and have excess for export.
So if Xenophobia has comparative advantage in for example yam production, and meets its local needs while having excess. It will make no economic sense to waste this excess. Instead it will be better to export the excess and make money for the country.
B.only new information affects stock prices.
Answer: According to the principle of comparative advantage, worldwide output and consumption will be higher when nations specialize in the production of those goods and services "a. they can provide at a lower opportunity costs."
Explanation: The comparative advantage is the ability of a country to produce a good using relatively less resources than another. The theory of comparative advantages says that Each country in question will specialize in what is most efficient. At the same time, it will import the rest of the products in which they are most ineffective in terms of production. Although a country does not have an absolute advantage in producing any good, it may specialize in those goods in which it finds a greater comparative advantage and finally be able to participate in the international market.
C is the answer. Hope this helps.
Answer:
A: Demand of euros in foreign market.
B: Supply of Euros
C: Demand of Euros
D: Demand of Euros
E: Supply of Euros
F: Demand of Euros
G: Supply on Euros.
