Answer:
The correct answer that fills the gap is: Fall.
Explanation:
The paradox of saving or paradox of frugality or paradox of austerity suggests, according to the Keynesian economic aspect, that if all the inhabitants try to save more, that is to say to dedicate to saving a greater percentage of their income, the aggregate demand will fall, the production will fall and the total population savings will be equal or lower.
The explanation of the paradox is because the total income of the population (Y) is equal to the sum of the income of its individuals. Since personal income can be used for consumption or savings, and that consumption forms an essential part of aggregate demand - which finances global income through income and wages - if the percentage of savings increases, logically consumption will decrease , so that aggregate demand will decrease further and, consequently, global income, which will cause personal income to fall. When personal income or income falls, each individual will have to dedicate a greater percentage of their income to save in order to continue saving the same in absolute terms. This will further reduce their consumption (already reduced by the fall in income) so that income will be even more reduced and so on to the point that some or many must use their savings in order to solve the decrease in income.
------
NOTE: If you need to extend the explanation given, you can make a comment or add a new question. I will be very pleased to help you.
Answer: $178,000
Explanation:
The following information can be derived from the question:
We have to first calculate the total manufacturing cost. This will be:
Direct material 29000
Add: Direct labor 58000
Add: manufacturing overhead 82000
Then the manufacturing cost will be:
= 29000 + 58000 + 82000
= 169000
We then add the beginning work in progress and then subtract the ending work in progress. This will be:
Manufacturing cost = 169000
Add: Beginning WIP = 66000
Less: Ending WIP = 57000
= 169000 + 66000 - 57000
= $178,000
Answer:
C. GREEN MARKETING
Explanation:
Green Marketing is marketing of products proclaimed as environmentally safe. This marketing incorporates many important P's of Marketing : Product ('<em>green' p</em>roduction process), Packaging (eg: biodegradable).
This type of marketing can also includes 'Corporate Social Responsibility' , investment in environmental upgradation as is the case in the question.
Value Proposition is statement to consumers' convincing their product distinctive worthiness. Brandfest is prospecting consumers collecting event , eg- exhibition. Branded Content is marketing through creation & dissemination of content . None of these three are related to it.
Answer: Option B
Explanation: Competitive intelligence refers to the study of different factors of the business environment by the organisation for helping the senior management to make strategic decision making.
This study analyzes the factors that directly affects the organisation. The channel of distribution of the competitor can be used to understand their strategy for making their market. An organisation could use this information by improving their channel and gaining a competitive advantage.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B
Answer:
d. beta did a better job of explaining the returns than standard deviation
Explanation:
Beta measures the systemic risk associated with the particular investment, it do not compute the total risk associated, which is more logical.
Standard deviation computes the total risk associated.
Some risk is natural, like the risk of floods, natural calamities, earthquake, etc:
That risk shall not counted as for comparison as that is associated universally. Further, the risk associated with particular factors like bankruptcy of a company, or some legal case issue of a company are precisely described by beta coefficient.
Thus, beta provides better details about explaining the returns.
