Answer: C) Is accepted as true until proven false
==========================================================
Explanation:
We cannot prove the hypothesis to be 100% true because there might be data out there that we haven't accounted for, or some scenario that we haven't thought of yet. There's always going to be room for uncertainty and doubt. Keep in mind that such doubt does not necessarily mean that the theory is automatically false.
So all of this rules out choice A.
Choice B is ruled out as well because data supporting a hypothesis doesn't falsify the hypothesis. The term "falsify" means "to prove false" as you'd expect.
Choice C is the answer because the data seems to support the hypothesis and again we leave room for error. It's quite possible that in some unspecified date in the future, there are better methods of measurement to get a better sense of what's going on.
Choice D is ruled out because a law refers to something like the law of gravity. It's something you observe but it doesn't explain why something works. It doesn't provide the underlying mechanics of what's going on. We simply just report what we see which is exactly what an observation is.
Answer:
Poor infrastructure that results in services that fall short of being adequate.
Famine often caused by bad crops or unfavorable weather conditions.
Lack of adequate medical care.
High levels of long-term unemployment.
Extreme poverty and lack of socio-economic upward mobility.
Answer:
Yes because in 2021 you have to take more into accountability, such as social distancing, masks, corona guidelines, and other things.
Political efficacy is the ability to influence government and politics, a perceived lack of political efficacy reflects a lack of faith in government, where citizens feel that their actions do not affect government and their political leaders. Efficacy normally increases with age and when people feel low political efficacy they tend to feel less engaged and have less strong views.
