Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given question.
We can write the null hypothesis & the alternative hypothesis as:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
From above, let's think about the type I error we could make and the type II error we could make.
<u>Type I error:</u>
The type I error at the null hypothesis showcases that the snow level is at 6 inches or below 6 inches, but we falsely concluded that the snow level is high above sea level.
<u>Type II error:</u>
Here, the snow level is literally above 6 inches, hence, we failed to conclude that the snow level is above 6 inches.
Thus, the consequences of the above analysis showcase that type II error has higher severe consequences because it may result in a situation that may endanger the passengers' safety.
Answer:
x=4
Step-by-step explanation:
-x=-3x+8
-x+3x=-3x+8+3x
2x=8
2x/2 = 8/2
x = 4
2/4 is the larger fraction. Think of a candy bar that is cut into 4 equal pieces. Now think of the same sized candy bar cut into 6 pieces. The candy bar that has been cut into sixths has more pieces but they are smaller pieces that the candy bar cut into fourths.
**When comparing fractions, if the numerators are the same (like they are in this problem) look at the denominators. Whichever fraction has the greater number is actually going to be the smaller fraction (more pieces, but smaller pieces). If the denominators are the same, then the fraction that has the greater number in the numerator will be the larger fraction (more same-sized pieces than the other fraction)
Hope that helps!
11 skirts since you can use 3/4 on each yard of 9. Then you get a remander of 2, 3/4! 9 + 2 is 11.
Answer:
Hey!
The car travelled 135 kilometers!
Step-by-step explanation:
Here you have to do the speed (45km/h) multiplied by the time (3 hours)
45 x 3 = 135
So the car has travelled 135 kilometers!
HOPE THIS HELPS!!
