I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. The statement that is not true of slavery in ancient Rome would be that s<span>laves included persons used as teachers and physicians. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
Sir Walter Raleigh<span>The Roanoke Colony, also known as the Lost Colony, was established in 1585 on Roanoke Island in what is today's Dare County, North Carolina. It was a late 16th-century attempt by Queen Elizabeth I to establish a permanent English settlement in North America. The colony was founded by Sir Walter Raleigh.</span>
Answer:
The answer is A. It provides businesses with money for growth in exchange for shares of ownership.
Explanation:
Share market plays a vital role in Market economies by playing a major role to assist corporations to raise funds to expand.
In Share Market, many types of financial instruments are traded. Commonly, they are Stocks and Bonds, Stock represents the equity capital that entails the Ownership of a company while corporate bonds represents debt capital (Its like a loan that a company takes from you for a specific period of time and then pays back to you with an interest.)
Answer:
The Nazis win and a weak Nazi regime would be established.
Explanation:
The Southern Embargo on cotton led Britain and France to become less reliant on American cotton. Colonies like India and Egypt decreased Britain and France's reliance on American cotton, which was a staple of the Southern economy. The South emerged economically devastated, and had a long recovery. But if they did not return to the Union, and they could not rely on Northern industry, this recovery would be even slower. And with the division, both parts of the union would be significantly weaker. For this reason, America would have played a less significant role in WWII. The result is speculative of course, but it's possible that if America decided not to enter, or could not produce a strong army, then the Nazis would have had a much easier time with their goal. I think that the only scenario where the Nazis would have won is an instance where they developed nuclear bombs first--and used a scorched Earth strategy to eliminate the Russian threat. This would be my speculation, but past victory, it's hard to say what would have happened. The Roman Government lasted for thousands of years, and perhaps the Nazi regime could last for a while before becoming de-stabilized, but I don't think it would have been a strong centralized regime. The reason I say this is because not even Caesar or Napoleon (brilliant diplomats and military strategists) could not achieve this. But this (of course) is speculative.
(Fun question, never done "hypothetical history")