Answer:
The error in subject-verb agreement is underlined below:
<u>Jenny's favorite hiking trail </u><u>wind</u> from the base of Mt. Diablo up to the summit which offers breathtaking views of the surrounding area.
Explanation:
Although the sentence above has quite a long subject - "Jenny's favorite hiking trail" - we can easily pinpoint which word is the most important in it: "trail". All the while, the sentence is talking about a trail. Therefore, the verb that follows the subject needs to agree with "trail", which is a third-person singular word.
That is precisely where we have an error. The verb "wind" is not in its singular form. In the present tense, the singular form of verbs ends in -s, -es, or -ies for the third person. In the case of "wind", it should be "winds". Therefore, the correct agreement would be:
- Jenny's favorite hiking trail winds from the base . . .
The rest of the sentence is alright.
Answer:
- A Casual fallacy.
Explanation:
'Casual fallacy' or the 'questionable cause' is demonstrated as the informal flaw in reasoning in which a cause is identified or recognized inappropriately.
As per the given description, the members of the audience identified the statement as a demonstration of 'a casual fallacy' as it involves an incorrect identification of the cause that 'if an unrecognized person is seen running down the sidewalk in our neighborhood, he/she would be assumed as the criminal of an offence' and 'they must be handed over to the authority by calling at 911'. Since the deduction is based on an inappropriate cause, it exemplifies the <u>'casual fallacy</u>.'
I want to get my drivers license as soon as possible. I want to get it so soon so I can drive as far away as possible from this place.
Answer: Exposition/introduction. Rising action. Climax/turning point.
