Answer:
Based on word choice, Giblin feels:
B. that it was worthwhile.
Explanation:
We can easily eliminate options A and C, since there is nothing conveying a negative connotation in the excerpt. We are left with options B and D.
Let's take a look at option D first. It says Giblin thinks the process of obtaining copies of the stone was amazing. However, that is not what the word choice conveys. Had there been words such as "fantastic" or "incredible" in the excerpt, this option would have made sense. But that is not the case.
<u>Option B is the only correct one. The excerpt uses words such as "fortunately", "good", and "clear". Those words convey the idea that the process the French used was worthwhile. It not only worked, but worked well, effectively.</u>
The correct answer is <span>what is written in the Constitution is not open to interpretation
Strict constructionism is a way of interpreting the constitution. Constructionists only accept what is written and the way in which it was written. There is nothing beyond what is written and from his point of view, if it says that all people are equal and citizens of the United States then all people indeed, including African-Americans. For him, there is no interpretation that looks at deeper meaning, what is written is what is intended and that's why he is a strict constructionist. </span>
Answer:
Poor spelling and grammar are an indication that the site may not be credible.
if it .com, . org, it is crebible most of the time
the program has lots of issues
and the art or design does not look to good
always asking your for info
Explanation:
Answer:
Our atmosphere helps protect the earth from collisions with small objects, however, when the atmosphere can't protect it from big objects the effects can go far beyond the crater. any scientists think that the collision that happened between the large space rock and Earth 65 millino years ago may have been the cause for the global destruction that caused teh dinosaurs to go extinct.
Answer:
Explanation:
Freneau’s poems on the force of the imagination may seem to be light-years away from his political poetry; such, however, is hardly the case. His poems on politics and the imagination merely represent two sides of the same coin whose mint is freedom.
