The correct answer is - B. Abortion rights.
The religious right has always been against the abortion rights of women and they have always tried to restrict them. In their opinion it is a sin and it is against God's will, and every concealed child has to be born and given the chance to live.
Now this has always been very controversial and the majority of people in the western world don't agree with it, and there's multiple very good reasons for it:
- a woman can be raped and impregnated
- the child might be unplanned and the couple is not feeling ready both emotionally and financially to raise a child
- women have right to decide about their own bodies
- in the early stages the fetus is still not a separate functional organism but in fact is literary a parasite to the human body
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
Although lacking a charter, the founders of Plymouth in Massachusetts were, like enabling them to devote their time to building a strong, stable
Answer:
capturing island one by one as stepping stones toward japan
