Answer:
The best passage would be the last one.
Explanation:
I would think that it would deal mainly with how much effort the person puts into the little things such as grammar because if they don't pay attention to the easiest things such as that, then it makes you think about what else this person might have gotten wrong.
I may be wrong, but those are my thoughts on the matter.
Answer:
- Morality and Humanitarianism.
Explanation:
As per the question, the value exhibited by the 'belief in justice and equality' would correspond to 'morality and humanitarianism' as these values comprehend the given beliefs. Morality is described as the set of values that specifies acceptable forms of conduct in order to ensure 'righteousness' or 'goodness' while 'humanitarianism' is illustrated as the belief that promotes human welfare and their treatment with respect and dignity by alleviating sufferings. <em>Both these values together strengthens the belief in justice and equality as these are directly associated with 'righteous conduct' and 'human welfare'. </em>
Answer: the quotation is presented as part of the writing and does not stand on its own A.
Explanation: test
Answer: Dr. Naismith would have been surprised, if he had known how popular basketball would become.
Explanation:
The best way to combine these two sentences is to put a comma between them.
When joined together, these two sentences form a third conditional sentence.
In a third conditional sentence, one part of the sentence contains 'would have' + past participle <em>(would have been surprised)</em>, while the other part of the sentence contains 'if' and past perfect form of the verb (<em>if he had known</em>). Third conditional sentences are used to talk about impossible outcomes. Dr. Naismith was a physical educator who died in 1939. Therefore, the scenario of him witnessing the popularity of basketball is not possible.