The correct answer is evidence.
When it comes to making inferences about something (understanding the text), we need to use everything we can from the text - and rely on evidence, on proof, on the information found in the text in order to do that. Conflict, setting, and resolution won't help us as much as evidence can.
<em>despon</em><em>ible</em><em> </em><em>means</em><em> </em><em>"</em><em>throw</em><em> </em><em>away</em><em> </em><em>after</em><em> </em><em>used</em><em>"</em>
<em>Arigato</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
A topic sentence for lord of the flies could be like about the boys going savage, or the way they organize who does what, another one could be how the boys make rules.
It looks as though this essay should be an argumentative/persuasive essay. As such, there are two main ways to construct this. Knowing you should refute two points from the article, you could do this by either mentioning the opposing viewpoints first then your refutes (known as the block method), or you could do this point by point by stating an opposing viewpoint, then refuting it in the same paragraph (known as the point-by-point method). That said, here are two sample outlines assuming you mention two points:
OUTLINE 1 (Block Method)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-opposing viewpoint 2
Body Paragraph 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
OUTLINE 2 (Point-by-Point)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
Body Paragraph 2
-opposing viewpoint 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
Answer:
The action slows when Annie and Anagnos have a discussion, and the play becomes boring.
Explanation:
This is not someting that they should include in a summary. Instead it should be replaced by what Annie and Anagnos are talking about for an effective summary.
Hope this helps!
