<span>This means that the two states involved will lead to concurrent jurisdiction between the federal and state courts. This could lead to Jack looking for the court that will give him the most favorable ruling against the business for selling a defective product.</span>
Answer:
Remarketing
Explanation:
The remarketing is a marketing technique in which the company could able to see that how many people visited on their site , actually visited , and whether any action is taken on the website so that they could analyze the visitors per hour or per day as per their convenience and according to that they motivate the customers via connecting through social media to purchase the company products so that the company could able to increase their sales
So in the given situation, since the Gavin is creating a Google Display Ads campaign designed with a view to increasing the sales and wants to reach the potential customers and convenience them to purchase their products by applying the discount code
Therefore, for this, the remarketing is a good option
Answer: The correct answers are "A. Accept" and "$ 0.01".
Explanation: Given that we talk about optimal strategy when maximizing the expected profit by the player:
In the first case It is convenient to accept the proposal and keep $ 0.12, instead of rejecting it and running out of nothing.
And in the second case it is convenient to give the classmate as little as possible so that he accepts and we have a greater profit.
The correct answer is side streets.
If you are in a hurry, it may be better to take a different route and drive through side streets in order to avoid the traffic which is usually present in the more 'popular streets.' However, side streets have a lot of traffic control lights, which may slow down your ride even more.
Answer:
$80 million
Explanation:
We know that
Multiplier = (1) ÷ (1 - marginal propensity to consume)
= (1) ÷ (1 - 0.75)
= (1) ÷ (0.25)
= 4
Now the GDP would increase by
= Increase in Investment spending × multiplier effect
= $20 billion × 4
= $80 million increase
We simply multiplied the investment spending increase with the multiplier effect
