Answer:
2. 20 years under scenario A, versus 16 years under scenario B
Explanation:
It is clearer if I explained with an example:
Let suppose that a nation´s real GDP for 2018 was 1000. In scenario A you will have:
2019:1000*3.5%=1035
2020:1035*3.5%=1071,2
and so on, the same for scenario B
2019: 1000*4,5%= 1045
2020: 1045*4,5%= 1092
and so on.
I attached an excel table where you can see that: in the first scenario, between year 20 and 21 (2038 and 2039) the GDP will double and in the second one, between year 15 and 16 GDP will double. The answer is 2.
Misusing company time.
Abusive behavior.
Employee theft.
Lying to employees.
Violating company internet policies.
Answer:
B. The States
Explanation:
According to the Constitution of the United States, the national government as well as the state government have powers. There is a need however, to describe the difference between express and implied powers.
Express powers are specifically mentioned in the constitution while implied powers are powers the body of government will have as a result of its interference and connection to the express power.
Therefore, since the national government supersedes the state governments, any power that is connected to the express power constitutionally given to the federal government is referred to its implied power and as such the state is expected to also respect such.
<u>However, any power that is not express or implied to be the power of the national government according to the Tenth Amendment is expressly reserved to the States</u>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": The Business Judgment Rule.
Explanation:
The Business Judgment Rule is a law that protects a company's Board of Directors (BoD) from inconsistent allegations from shareholders stating that the BoD is acting against the stakeholders' interest. The law presumes that members of the BoD act in "<em>good faith</em>" and that they do not always make the best decisions.
The Business Judgment Rule helps managers, in such a way, to avoid laws where there is no substantial proof that they had intentions to go against the investors' will.
Answer:
The answer is: D) both Dan and Andrea will gain from the transaction.
Explanation:
Whenever a business transaction is done freely, not forcefully, by mutual consent and without any type of fraud being committed, then both parties win. Andrea should be happy with her $150 and she will be able to buy anything she wants or likes (in the price range). Dan should also be happy and start playing with his Wii as soon as possible so he can enjoy the most out of his new purchase.
The only reason why someone would lose in this transaction is that Andrea was forced to sell her Wii at a lower price than she thought. Or Dan was forced to buy the Wii at a higher price than he considered appropriate. Or Andrea stole the Wii from someone else, it really doesn´t work or anything else illegal about it.
