<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "bias", since this implies that the author is not speaking from a place of objectivity, but instead is trying to pursue an "agenda".</span></span>
Answer: Historiography for the Purpose of Nationalism.
Explanation:
The emergence of nationalism in a world dating back to the late eighteenth century. Get your full swing in the next two. Nationalism is reflected through all pores of political, social and scientific life. The emergence of nationalism also reflected on historiography.
Many historians have been encouraged by nationalism. Many of these works have emerged as a result of these tendencies. It is often a syndrome of lesser value because myths characterize most of these historical works. Their scientific value is also called into question. The historian must be objective when writing. The question is, where does this phenomenon come from? Nationalism in historiography seeks to portray, one national entity as larger than another. That is, to minorize another. A patriot historian can be objective, unlike a nationalist.
I believe it was the "Europe First" strategy. Hope this helped!
Answer:
<em>Iroquois</em>: formed a confederation that may have inspired the US constitution
<em>Powhatan: </em>gave women a voice in choosing tribal representatives and helped the first settlers from Europe survive
That is my answer.
I also think it is the first one, but I am not entirely sure.
