1. We can infer from the details of the passage that true or romantic love is more complex than lust because: it's more complex because we have no control over it and it is permanent.
2. The inferences that one can make about the types of subjects she has studied in addition to psychology is that she has studied "Philosophy".
<h3>What is inference?</h3>
Inference refers to the conclusion that one arrives as a result of observation and evaluation. Inference tends to be the final conclusion of an experimentation.
Sentence Frames:
1. In paragraph 2, the physicist Jim Al-Khalili states that lust is "is a
temporary passionate s**ual desire" and that it increases the release of a few chemicals in the body. On the other hand, true love "love is a powerful neurological condition like hunger or thirst, only more permanent" and is a condition he describes as "<u>permanent</u>" which shows that true love is more complex than lust.
In paragraph 3, the psychotherapist Philippa Perry refers to "love". In paragraph 4, she mentions "Aristotle" and lists "the philosophical saying of Aristotle".
Therefore, I can infer that Perry has studied "Philosophy".
3. In paragraph 7, the romantic novelist Jojo Moyes explains that love can be like "an obsession" and be "all consuming" so I can infer she is likely to include characters who were obsessed by love. Moyes also says that what "fascinates" her is "what separates love." Therefore, I can infer the plots of her books probably contain the incidences that led to separation of love.
Learn more about types of love on brainly.com/question/21491281
#SPJ1
Answer:
A monologue is a speech given by a single character in a story. In drama, it is the vocalization of a character’s thoughts; in literature, the verbalization.
Explanation:
A monologue speaks at people, not with people. Many plays and shows involving performers begin with a single character giving a monologue to the audience before the plot or action begins. Monologues give the audience and other characters access to what a particular character is thinking, either through a speech or the vocalization of their thoughts. While the purpose of a speech is obvious, the latter is particularly useful for characterization: it aids the audience in developing an idea about what the character is really thinking, which in turn helps (or can later help) explain their previous (or future) actions and behavior.
Answer:
Making judgments about whether a person is morally responsible for her behavior, and holding others and ourselves responsible for actions and the consequences of actions, is a fundamental and familiar part of our moral practices and our interpersonal relationships.
Explanation:
Moral responsibility refers to a call to action, where the opposite(inaction) would result in a moral failure. an example would be if you see a person choking, and you know how to perform the Heimlich manuver but rather than help you do nothing. You are by inaction assisting in that persons death.
