1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
True [87]
3 years ago
15

De-contextualizing is a good and important practice for biblical interpretation.

History
1 answer:
klasskru [66]3 years ago
8 0

De-contextualizing is not good and important practice for biblical interpretation.

Contextualization is the practice of giving meaning as a method of analyzing the setting in which a message or action is carried out in the domain of Bible translation and interpretation. Contextualization is a method of analyzing Bible interpretations in connection to their cultural contexts.

So, the given statement is false.

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/2816100?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in
What happened to Christians in the Roman Empire at the end of the third century?
zhuklara [117]

Answer:

There was no empire-wide persecution of Christians until the reign of Decius in the third century. ... With the passage in AD 313 of the Edict of Milan, in which the Roman Emperors Constantine the Great and Licinius legalised the Christian religion, persecution of Christians by the Roman state ceased.

Explanation:

Hope this helps.

6 0
3 years ago
What organization did King help found in 1957?
Masteriza [31]
It was the "<span>d. Southern Christian Leadership Conference" that King helped found in 1957, which had a profound and wide-reaching impact on the Civil Rights movement. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
I need help please. IN YOUR OWN WORDS
Taya2010 [7]
Nah foo I didn't watch the video how am I supposed to describe it?
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the explanation suggest about the Pilgrim's religious convictions?
melomori [17]

Answer:

answer:- it suggest that the pilgrims thought that god would save them and that god had direct action on their lives

3 0
2 years ago
What do you think was the most important thing that the New colonies were able to produce? Why?
Vilka [71]

The most important thing was to be able to be a market for the colonial masters. It was often the case that the colonial masters used the colonies as a market because they had a mercantilist policy.

They used the colonies to sell their goods, and often traded with them, such as slaves. Sugar and tobacco were important for the american colonies that europe took. Coming out of Africa, slaves were the main market.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the differences between the domestic system and the factory system
    12·1 answer
  • 22. One of the many nonviolent acts of Mohandas Gandhi was
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the Continental Congress unable to provide the army with proper equipment? The Congress could not levy taxes. The Britis
    12·2 answers
  • What does the phrase fondness for first
    12·1 answer
  • When does obligation of citizenship require that personal desires and interests be subordinated to the public good?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the Boston Massacre on the colonists?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was diversity bad for the Austrian rulers?
    8·2 answers
  • In what way does the legislative branch check the power of the judicial branch?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a result of the Great Depression?
    14·1 answer
  • Ok WHAT WOULD U RATHER DO STAY HOME ALL DAY AND PLAY VIDEO GAMES OR GO EAT OUT
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!