Answer:
In syntactic analysis, a constituent is a word or a group of words that work as a solitary/ single unit within a progressive structure. Numerous constituents are phrases. A Phrase is an arrangement of words (in certain speculations at least two) worked around a head lexical thing and filling in as a unit inside a sentence.
Explanation:
A word sequence is demonstrated to be an expression/constituent on the off chance that it displays at least one of the practices examined beneath. The analysis of constituent structure is related predominantly with phrase structure grammar, despite the fact that dependency grammar likewise permit sentence structure to be separated into constituent parts.
The constituent structure of sentences is distinguished using tests for constituents.These tests apply to a segment of a sentence, and the outcomes give proof about the constituent structure of the sentence.
Answer:
A. The introduction is effective because it presents the topic in a compelling way, establishing a strong main point, and offers important supporting information.
Explanation:
In order to have a strong and effective introduction, you need to have a claim. Then use reasons for your claim. Next you'll want to use evidence that backs up your reasons before finally wrapping it all up with a conclusion. In the conclusion, restate your claim and why you think that way.
Answer:
O Man vs. Self
Explanation:
Man vs. Self is the internal conflict on the natural instincts of the human, as compared to the construct built upon the thoughts generated by the man. Essentially, it is Instinct vs. Thought-process. This is the first step in all conflicts, in which a person uses it to identify what their thought process is, the rationality behind what they believe in, and then putting their beliefs into action.
~
Wallace Stegner is saying that there is an ancestral and indivisible relation between mankind and nature, nature being a part of what defines us as human beings. This relation is so strong, that we have the power to sense the wilderness even we have never seen it. Destroying the wilderness is simply destroying an important part of ourselves. Without this part we can function and live normally.