Answer:
How much hair is your head.
That doesn't influence ur carbon footprint
Explanation:
Answer:
it would be slightly different than if he had written it directly after it happened.
Explanation:
Peoples memories change everytime they remember them, based off of their emotions at the moment and new life experiences. This would change somebodies knowledge of what happened. First hand accounts are always better, because it is fresh in somebody's mind.
A, because when you prewrite you draft your ideas and create vague ideas of your plans.
Grand assumptions would be exaggerations
This argument illustrates the slippery slope fallacy as Leo Panchello was used to create a happy picture of how much hard work local business owners put in and then goes on to tell how the light rail would destroy the local business and ruin all of their hard work which brings a sad ending.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
This is known as a mistaken belief, a faulty or failed reasoning especially one based on unsound argument.
Hence, the fallacy makes the argument weak because there's no indication that a light rail would destroy a main local business in the town as when constructing a light rail, they do not tear up the street, instead, they make the light rail a part of the street
A slippery slope fallacy is a course of action that is rejected because there is little or no evidence that one insists to lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end.
Read more about<em> fallacy </em>here:
brainly.com/question/1971023
#SPJ1
