1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lostsunrise [7]
2 years ago
10

List two events that occur in the us history that fueled manifest destiny

History
1 answer:
Andrei [34K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Economic: Acquiring more land would've given more opportunity to current and future settlers.  Reaching coast to coast would be better for trade, as well as getting people to settle in these areas with like the homestead act (easy to settle near sources of water and fertile land, rather than midwest)

Social: Manifest destiny is seen as a god given right to america at this point, each president that pushes it, believed and persuaded people into believing this. Reaching coast to coast is also a goal(Similar to like the moon landing) in its impact.

You can say that it is caused by the annexation of texas, mainly due to support for annexation began to form at this point. As well as their land disputes with britain, causing a rise in patriotism and the newly co'ined term 'manifest destiny'

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Please help!!! What is the best website or app to help me with my essay?
erica [24]
You should search this up online and try downloading the one that is best
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help Just click the picture and you can see clearly
abruzzese [7]

answer: the u.s constitution

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the great depression what were the men called that left their homes to find work
Finger [1]
They were called the okies
6 0
3 years ago
The winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the ________ vote to win the ___
Softa [21]

Answer:

The winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the popular vote to win the electoral vote, and a strong third-party candidate could win enough electoral votes to prevent either major-party candidate from receiving a majority of votes.

Explanation:

Most critics against the Electoral College state as one of their primary reasons the idea of the winner-take-all system allowing a candidate who has lost the popular vote to still win the electoral vote. Furthermore, they claim that a powerful third-party candidate could not only pull votes away from the major candidates but also bargain their way into the Electoral College.

4 0
3 years ago
When the international slave trade ended, how did the slave trade continue?
anzhelika [568]
B......................
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • From the late 1700s to the early 1800s, the Spanish built twenty-one missions in California.
    6·2 answers
  • How did Europeans treat North American natives
    5·1 answer
  • Which statements about China during the Sui dynasty are true?
    13·2 answers
  • What are some reasons or factors that convinced colonists to join the side of the patriots?
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!! What is the difference between the state and federal constitutions?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the event where king delivered his speech
    15·1 answer
  • What purpose did the comedic plays of Aristophanes serve?
    11·1 answer
  • What type of society did the southern states become after the civil war?
    8·2 answers
  • Which action best shows the U.S. goal of extending democracy throughout the world?
    5·1 answer
  • In the 1844 election, the phrase “Fifty-Four Forty or Fight!” referred to the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!