Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech)
Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer)
Explanation: Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech) it was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, stating that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution was stipulated as a First Amendment Revision protecting freedom of expression and freedom of the press to apply in the US states.
Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer) this is a case of the United States Supreme Court. In it, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that states are required, under the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, to provide a lawyer to defendants in criminal cases that cannot afford their own lawyers.
Answer:
C.Printing opinions to take away others' rights.
Explanation: Okay so let me start out! There is an entire Bill of rights (Connected with constitution) Giving citizens in our country several rights (known as ammendments) They are meant to state your rights as a civilian of the US. These shall not be tampered with, and if you want to look even further into the declaration of independance (Paragraph 3) its states you have "Unalienable rights" meaning your rights shall not be tampered with/Taken away.
Thus, the logical answer would be C.
Answer:
Pearl Harbor, 7 December 1941
On 7 December 1941, “a date which will live in infamy,” Japanese carrier-borne aircraft attacked the US Pacific fleet at its base at Pearl Harbor in the Hawaiian Islands.May 17, 2022
Includes event: Surrender of Japan
Combatants: United Kingdom
Maximian
They were then both given someone beneath them to make the tetrarchy
