1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna11 [192]
3 years ago
5

What makes a pure substance different from a heterogeneous mixture?

Chemistry
2 answers:
Oduvanchick [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The components of a pure substance are single elements or compounds instead of a mixture of compounds  

Explanation:

This is the most nearly correct answer. The mixture could also consist of different elements or of elements and compounds.

A and B are wrong. The components of a pure substance are mixed evenly and do not have particles in suspension.

C is wrong. The statement is true, but it does not explain the difference between pure substances and mixtures.

Vaselesa [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: The components of a pure substance are single elements or compounds instead of a mixture of compounds.

Explanation: Pure substance consits of a pure type of particle.

                      All elements and compounds that are considered as pure will have fixed boiling point and melting point.

You might be interested in
The graph above represents an object moving with a __________________. A) constant velocity B) constant acceleration C) constant
Ann [662]

Answer: I think its C or B

Explanation: Hope this was helpful....

4 0
3 years ago
What element is this atom?<br> (Urgent plz help)
Fofino [41]

Answer: Argon ( Ar )

Explanation: This is element is silicon because it has 18 protons.

***If you found my answer helpful, please give me the brainliest. :) ***

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A 3.00g of a certain Compound X, known to be made of carbon, hydrogen and perhaps oxygen, and to have a molecular molar mass of
andrew-mc [135]

Answer: The molecular formula for the given organic compound X is C_6H_{8}O_7

Explanation:

We are given:

Mass of CO_2=4.13g

Mass of H_2O=1.13g

We know that:

Molar mass of carbon dioxide = 44 g/mol

Molar mass of water = 18 g/mol

For calculating the mass of carbon:

In 44g of carbon dioxide, 12 g of carbon is contained.

So, in 4.13 g of carbon dioxide, =\frac{12}{44}\times 4.13=1.13g of carbon will be contained.

For calculating the mass of hydrogen:

In 18g of water, 2 g of hydrogen is contained.

So, in 1.13 g of water, \frac{2}{18}\times 1.13=0.125g of hydrogen will be contained.

Mass of oxygen in the compound = (3.00) - (1.13+ 0.125) = 1.75 g

To formulate the empirical formula, we need to follow some steps:

Step 1: Converting the given masses into moles.

Moles of Carbon =\frac{\text{Given mass of Carbon}}{\text{Molar mass of Carbon}}=\frac{1.13g}{12g/mole}=0.094moles

Moles of Hydrogen =\frac{\text{Given mass of Hydrogen}}{\text{Molar mass of Hydrogen}}=\frac{0.125g}{1g/mole}=0.125moles

Moles of Oxygen =\frac{\text{Given mass of oxygen}}{\text{Molar mass of oxygen}}=\frac{1.75g}{16g/mole}=0.109moles

Step 2: Calculating the mole ratio of the given elements.

For the mole ratio, we divide each value of the moles by the smallest number of moles

For Carbon = \frac{0.094}{0.094}=1

For Hydrogen = \frac{0.125}{0.094}=1.33

For Oxygen = \frac{0.109}{0.094}=1.16

Step 3: Taking the mole ratio as their subscripts.

The ratio of C : H : O = 1: 1.33: 1.16

Converting them into whole number ratios by multiplying by 6:

The ratio of C : H : O = 6: 8: 7

Hence, the empirical formula for the given compound is C_6H_8O_7

Empirical mass = 6\times 12+8\times 1+7\times 16=192g

The equation used to calculate the valency is :

n=\frac{\text{molecular mass}}{\text{empirical mass}}

Putting values in above equation, we get:

n=\frac{192g/mol}{192g/mol}=1

Multiplying this valency by the subscript of every element of empirical formula, we get:

C_6H_8O_7\times 1=C_6H_{8}O_7

Thus molecular formula for the given organic compound X is C_6H_{8}O_7

7 0
3 years ago
Why was the theory of the atom so controversial back in the early 1900’s
Anastaziya [24]
Some people weren't convinced with the theory. Also many people tried to prove that the atom didn't exist, or at least prove the theory wrong.

4 0
4 years ago
What is the total energy change for the following reaction: H2 + I2 -&gt; 2HI?
Paladinen [302]
I think the answer to this question will be +7kj/mol
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • the identity of an element depends on the number of: a. protons in the atom b electrons in the atom c. protons and neutrons in t
    11·2 answers
  • Whats the noble gas notation for copper
    14·1 answer
  • In the molecule of carbon dioxide (Co2) what do the symbols represent
    10·2 answers
  • Please please help i dont get it
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a chemical reaction?
    10·1 answer
  • Symbol #e" Orbital diagram and electron configuration can someone help
    7·1 answer
  • I haven't slept in 2 days and am so exhausted. Please if anyone could help... I have class in 2 hours and it's 3am rn
    11·1 answer
  • I took 100 micrograms of vitamin d yesterday (13yrs old) is it bad
    15·1 answer
  • The Ksp of Al(OH)3 is 2.0 x 10-31 at 298 K. What is \DeltaGo (at 298 K) for the precipitation of Al(OH)3 according to the equati
    12·1 answer
  • Cream of tartar creates a white-purple flame when burned. What can you hypothesize is a component of the cream
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!