1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
schepotkina [342]
3 years ago
15

Is it possible to be both Enlightened and despotic?

History
1 answer:
Tresset [83]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Enlightened despotism, also called benevolent despotism, form of government in the 18th century in which absolute monarchs pursued legal, social, and educational reforms inspired by the Enlightenment. Among the most prominent enlightened despots were Frederick II (the Great), Peter I (the Great), Catherine II (the Great), Maria Theresa, Joseph II, and Leopold II. They typically instituted administrative reform, religious toleration, and economic development but did not propose reforms that would undermine their sovereignty or disrupt the social order.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The British Museum has many objects on its website. Which would you like to visit online? Check all that apply.
Dafna11 [192]

phoenician sphix- alion with wings and a man's head

8 0
3 years ago
European dominance in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries was aided by 1) Nationalism 2)Socialism 3)Patriotism 4)Multicultura
kow [346]
1 - Nationalism

The last part of the statement, "as people had a common bond of loyalty for the ideals of their country," is essentially the definition of Nationalism.

Hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
When King Menes united the kingdoms of Upper and Lower Egypt by establishing a succession of rulers from the same family, he fou
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
He founded the first Egyptian empire. because he united the two kingdoms of the same place or region. 
Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What event finally caused the U.S. to enter World War I?
bekas [8.4K]
The attack on pearl harbor
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain an action that congress could take to respond to the Arizona v. United States decision if it disagreed with the decision
marissa [1.9K]

Answer:

Congress could make the decision to provide subsidies to local governments.

Explanation:

Arizona v. United States was related to the power and freedom of authorities and representatives of local governments in relation to federal immigration laws. This autonomy could cause local governments to act in disagreement with federal immigration objectives. As a result, Congress decided that federal laws would be valid laws across the country, but local governments could establish their own guidelines regarding investigation of factors involving immigration.

Congress could have decided to provide subsidies to local governments that did not have the capacity to comply with federal immigration laws, so that they had sufficient resources to comply with them.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the catholic church try to fight the spread of protestant ideas?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following BEST describes the difference between the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security? A. The Department
    7·1 answer
  • How do totalitarian regimes foster compliance by those who disagree with the objectives of the regime?
    7·1 answer
  • By the end of 2012, about _____ million families were receiving SNAP benefits
    14·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with History?
    5·1 answer
  • Information
    10·1 answer
  • What are three different ways that African Americans were denied the<br> right to vote
    8·2 answers
  • Which allies gained territory
    5·1 answer
  • Who are the "shareholders" of a corporation?
    13·1 answer
  • What are some ways the people of East Asia depend on rivers?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!