Answer:
A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A because it uses the correct amout of "" to showcase dialogue.
I believe the answer is C. That's the closest answer to the story, as they both go by Ernest, all the while, not being earnest.
Answer:
I'm 99 percent sure it's D. I've read the story a little while ago and I think she runs slither's away with the last egg after Rikki-Tikki crushed the rest
Explanation:
If this is not it please tell me
Answer and explanation:
<em>"So it was the hand that started it all... his hands had been infected, and soon it would be his arms...his hands were ravenous". </em>(Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, page 41).
This quote explains a part of the story in which Montag returns back to his home after another book-burning mission. But this one ended tragically because a woman set her house on fire. Before the woman commands herself on this decision, Montag takes a specific book with him. And is after he reads this book, that he starts his rebellion against the state. So that's why the book says that it would this hand (Montag's hand) that started it all.
An example of a moral dilemma using direct characterization would be :
<span>Jake, brave, pitiful, and older than his years, gazed down at his starving family. His mother had passed on a few months ago, and her dying wish was that the family stay together. Jake knew the foster system; it was unlikely that they could all stay together, especially with his track record with the law. Yet, he knew that they would not survive long without more food and money. He felt torn between fulfilling his promise to his mother and that other promise he made, the promise to himself. He had vowed to change his life when his mother was diagnosed with cancer. Stealing would fulfill her promise (as long as he didn't get caught) but break the promise to himself that made him a new man. This new man cared for his siblings; what would happen to his family if he became a thief?
</span>
This is the correct answer on edgenuity
