This story is<em> “To Kill a Mockingbird”, </em>written by Harper Lee. The children Jem and Scout Finch live in Maycomb and they witness how their father Atticus Finch defends a black man Tom Robinson. They know he is not guilty, but the jury is prejudiced against black men. In the courtroom, as the jury comes to deliver the verdict, Scout remembers how Atticus told her that a jury never looks at a man they have convicted. Neither of the 12 members of the jury looked at Tom Robinson.
Question: Which of the following best assists readers in inferring that the jury will announce a unanimous guilty verdict?
Answer: <u><em>4. Scout’s dreamlike impression that matched what she knew about juries—that they never look at a defendant when they have voted to convict—gave a strong hint about the guilty verdict
</em></u>
The misplaced modifier is "wearing a bandanna." This sentence suggests that the building is wearing a bandanna, however the actual word it is trying to modify is the man.
Answer:
President Kennedy did not initially adrress the issue of civil rights. He did little to support the different bills. He chose not to make civil rights issues important during the time because he was afraid of losing support from southern voters. After he was elected president he started taking more action though
Yes. The correct way to write it would be "Beth, my two-year-old, is very curious, so I have to keep a close eye on her.
It is not either of the last two options because they would both have the opposite effect on your audience then you would want them to have. So out of the first two choices, I think Using a tone of frustration when describing how difficult it is to eat with forks and spoons would help you relate to the audience the best, making your argument the most compelling. Choice B is what I would go with.