Growing professionally comes with advises, comments (solicited and unsolicited), request for favours and also contributions. Moving up your professional career from the days of little beginning have always been accompanied with all of the requests and comments. As one levitates successfully, requests and contributions tend to increase. This can be scary and at the same time tiring as you go to question the sensibility of some of your decisions. While being inundated with these ’assistance', it is important that you carefully and thoroughly select the comments, contributions, requests of favours etc that is worth responding to. While some would be considered others will be discarded. Now, the question is how best can we politely turndown a person's request of favours and contributions without sounding rude, ungratetul and condescending. Both useful and irrelevant contributions deserve good responses. We could start by appreciating the request for favours and contributions, and tell whomsoever it may concern that you appreciate his/her assistance but unfortunately would not be needing them.
Answer:
ur answer good sir will be : financial analyst
and a brainliest will be good to thnx
Answer: jpeg because its a lot of people use it for quaity
The first step that Ebba should take is: Information gathering and Reconnaissance.
<h3>What is an In-house Penetration Test?</h3>
An in-house Penetration test is a form of offensive test that is aimed at finding the lapses that a system has and initiating attacks to know the best way to prevent them.
Before launching such a test it is advised to plan and gather information about the possible lapses.
This will help the pen tester to know what attacks to launch and the right measures to resolve them. So, the first step that Ebba should take is Information gathering and Reconnaissance.
Learn more about In-house Penetration test here:
brainly.com/question/19085749
Xor because in the XOR gate, if both inputs are the same, the output is zero but if they're different, the output is one