Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
I'm not lonely, but I'm fine with companionship
<span>The scenario in which when
asked who she is, Lucy responds that she is a medical student, a
volleyball player, and a volunteer at a local soup kitchen represent the individualistic type of
perspective .
</span>
<span>The individualist perspective assumes the focus of knowledge is people who learn, and that knowledge cannot extend beyond the physical limits of human beings. </span>
Siegfried and Roy have been friends for many years, but in the past few months, they seem to have less in common, and Roy has been thinking more about hanging out with a potential new friend means that Siegfried and Roy appear to be in the deterioration stage of friendship development. The bond that Siegfried-Roy relationship once had weakens, because of the individuals (or both of them) has changed.
