Answer: KWD; $99474 avoided
Explanation:
From the question, we're informed that the buyer was aware that the KWD had strengthened against the USD since 2003 coupled with the fact that KWD is a floating currency, it'll have been better if the contract was written in KWD as this will mean lesser money is paid.
Since 1 USD = 0.2816 KWD, and has been predicted to reduce to 1 USD = 0.265, the company would save:
= $1,588,000 × (0.2816-0.265)/0.265
= ($1,588,000 × 0.0166)/0.265
= $26360.8/0.265
= $ 99474
Product, price, place, promotion, people, positioning, partnerships, packaging! Hope this helps :)
When a company is based in Boston then it is considered to be a Northeastern company.
<h3>What is a company located in Boston called?</h3>
Boston is in the Northeast of the country and it is known for its history of industrial leadership.
A company that is based here would therefore be considered a Northeastern company which affiliates them with the excellence of Boston industrial production.
Find out more on Boston as an industrial center at brainly.com/question/21175899.
#SPJ12
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": integration.
Explanation:
The Baldrige Roadmap to Performance Excellence is the result of a study conducted analyzing how Baldrige Health Care leaders succeed in implementing their projects (2009). The approach has five (5) stages:
- Stage 0 - Status Quo. Regulatory compliance.
- Stage 1 - False Starts. Strategic improvement of the company processes.
- Stage 2 - Traction. The project matches the firm's strategy.
- Stage 3 - Integration. <em>Management approaches and the organization's operational processes are associated.
</em>
- Stage 4 - Sustaining. Continuous improvement.
Answer:
Option A is riskier
Explanation:
In this question, we want to know which of the two stocks is riskier.
To answer this, we can use the standard deviation of returns as a risk measure.
For a security with a big value for standard deviation of returns, its per period returns are wider making its range per day large.
Hence, what this means is that out of the two stocks, the one with a larger value of standard deviation of returns will guarantee more risk as it is expected to give a better ranges of price
Now back to the values in the question, we can see that the standard deviation of returns of stock A is greater than that of stock B which this makes it a more risky option