How did Spain's military endeavors affect its economy?

History

1 answer:

slega [8]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Spain at the start of XVI was not a developed country like Flanders but had a good merchant navy and some developed sectors, whih could have been the base of the development. Everything was ruined in wars in Center Europe for the benefit of Habsburg dinasty but not in Spanish interest because American silver was not enough.

Explanation:

i think? im sorry if wrong

You might be interested in

Which side repeatedly lost major battles in the early years of the war?

lidiya [134]

Answer:

the British and the french

8 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP I NEED THE ANSWERRRRR

Nata [24]

Vietnamization I’m pretty sure

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is a primary goal of conservations?

qaws [65]

Answer:

Match the answers:

Explanation:

Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904): The case upheld breaking up the monopoly controlling railroad lines from Chicago to the Pacific Northwest

Lochner v. New York (1905): The case found that state limitations on workers hours violated their ‘freedom to contract’

6 0

3 years ago

Which best describes John C. Calhoun’s views on states’ rights?

igomit [66]

The answer would be the first one because during the Nullification Crisis, he sided with the south and agreed with them that they shouldn't have to follow a law they believed to be unconstitutional.

3 0

3 years ago

Compare and contrast the ways that seventeenth-century

Lina20 [59]

Answer:

<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>

3 0

3 years ago