Answer:
A). Paying attention to what the negative is saying.
B). Identifying important pieces of evidence that the negative uses.
E). Thinking about a possible counterclaim.
Explanation:
As per the question, when the negative or opponent is presenting claim with along with the evidence one is required to <u>'pay complete attention to what he/she says'</u> as it would help in preparing the counterclaim accordingly and more efficiently to rebut or neglect his ideas. Then, <u>'Identification of important pieces of evidence that the negative uses'</u> as it help produce sufficient rebuttal evidence to counter it efficiently. Next, would be <u>'Thinking about a possible counterclaim'</u> to deny his claim and establish the credibility of his claim. Thus, <u>options A, B, and E</u> are the correct answers.
Answer: Fake news deliberately publishes incorrect information for the public.
Publishers of fake news are normally interested in financial gain.
Explanation: Fake news is untrue information presented as news. It often has the aim of damaging the reputation of a person or entity, or making money through advertising revenue. Once common in print, the prevalence of fake news has increased with the rise of social media.
"I would like to ride an elephant." said Dereck.
Hope I helped soz if I'm wrong ewe.
~Potato.
Answer:
Another example of 1) English Patriotism and 2) Henry trying to be "one of the guys,." He's offering them the chance to be elevated to the status of gentleman because of their bravery. Can also be compare this to the way in which the French discuss the battle of Harfleur, which is over-confident and basically talks about how they're going to take advantage of how weak the English army is. Talks about how they'll get to show their scars and remember what happens today, years from now==manhood. Henry implicits elevates the men he's fighting alongside to his own level of nobility-- so is he pushing himself down, or pulling the other soldiers up?
Answer:
A). It is odd that war should ever be viewed as an adventurous expedition.
Explanation:
Paradox is demonstrated as the literary device in which the author presents a statement that is self-contradictory or incongruous juxtaposition of ideas which captures the readers' attention and reveal a latent truth.
As per the question, option A i.e. 'it is odd that war should ever be viewed as an adventurous expedition' most appropriately elaborates the use of paradox in the given excerpt. The author <u>incongruously juxtaposes the conventional idea of war by presenting it as an 'adventurous expedition' which eventually turn into an 'exhaustion and war of attrition' </u>to highlight the serious concern that 'the causes for the war dampens over time and gradually all that is significant is staying alive'('no cause other than our own survival'). Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
