All categories

3 years ago

Compared to a Direct Unsubsidized Federal Loan, a Direct Subsidized Federal Loan provides which benefits?

1 answer:

3 0

<span>Compared to Direct Unsubsidized Loans the Direct Subsidized Loans have the major advantage that the federal government is responsible to pay for the interest of Direct Subsidized Loans for the duration of a study period in college or while the loan is in postponement. While in the case of for Direct Unsubsidized Loans the interest starts as soon as the loan is issued.</span>

You might be interested in

The labor-force participation rate tells us the fraction of the population that a. has chosen to participate in the labor market

Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

a. has chosen to participate in the labor market.

Explanation:

The formula to compute the labor-force participation rate is shown below:

Labor- force participation rate = Labor force ÷ Population of working age

By dividing the labor force with the Population of working age so that the labor force participation rate could come

Therefore, the option a is correct as it defines the participated in the labor market

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is true about bonds?

nata0808 [166]

Answer:

B. The primary advantage to municipal bonds is that interest income received is not taxed by the federal government.

Explanation:

A bond can be defined as a debt or fixed investment security, in which a bondholder (investor or creditor) loans an amount of money to the bond issuer (government or corporations) for a specific period of time. The bond issuer are expected to return the principal (face value) at maturity with an agreed upon interest (coupon), which are paid at fixed intervals.

A municipal bond can be defined as a type of bond that is typically issued by a municipality, county, local government or state in order to finance or sponsor capital expenditures for the public such as water supply, construction of roads, etc.

Hence, the primary advantage to municipal bonds is that interest income received on this type of bond is not taxed by the federal government.

8 0

3 years ago

100 POINTS PLZ HELP

Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

Hydrologist

Architect

Naval architect

Architectural or civil drafter

Materials lab and supply technician

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Sales $ 282,880 $ 270,800 $ 252,600 $ 234,560 $ 150,000 Cost of goods sold 128,200 122,080 115,280 106,

zhuklara [117]

Answer:

Sales

2019 Net Sales = 188.59%

2018 Net Sales = 180.53%

2017 Net Sales = 168.4%

2016 Net Sales = 156.37%

Cost of Goods Sold

2019Cost of Goods Sold = 191.34%

2018 Cost of Goods Sold = 182.21%

2017 Cost of Goods Sold = 172.06%

2016 Cost of Goods Sold = 158.87%

Accounts Receivable:

2019 Accounts Receivable = 201.11%

2018Accounts Receivable = 192.22%

2017Accounts Receivable = 182.22%

2016Accounts Receivable = 168.89%

Explanation:

Computation forn trend percents for the above accounts, using 2015 as the base year:

FOR SALES:

2019:

Net Sales = Sales 2019 / Sales 2015*100

Net Sales = $282,880 / $150,000 * 100

Net Sales = 188.59%

2018:

Net Sales = Sales 2018 / Sales 2015*100

Net Sales = $270,800 / $150,000 * 100

Net Sales = 180.53%

2017:

Net Sales = Sales 2017 / Sales 2015*100

Net Sales = $252,600 / $150,000 * 100

Net Sales = 168.4%

2016:

Net Sales = Sales 2016 / Sales 2015*100

Net Sales = $234,560 / $150,000 * 100

Net Sales = 156.37%

COST OF GOODS SOLD:

2019:

Cost of Goods Sold = Cost of Goods Sold 2019 / Cost of Goods Sold 2015 *100

Cost of Goods Sold = $128,200 / $67,000 * 100

Cost of Goods Sold = 191.34%

2018:

Cost of Goods Sold = Cost of Goods Sold 2018 / Cost of Goods Sold 2015 *100

Cost of Goods Sold = $122,080 / $67,000 * 100

Cost of Goods Sold = 182.21%

2017:

Cost of Goods Sold = Cost of Goods Sold 2017 / Cost of Goods Sold 2015 *100

Cost of Goods Sold = $115,280 / $67,000 * 100

Cost of Goods Sold = 172.06%

2016:

Cost of Goods Sold = Cost of Goods Sold 2016 / Cost of Goods Sold 2015 *100

Cost of Goods Sold = $106,440 / $67,000 * 100

Cost of Goods Sold = 158.87%

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE:

2019:

Accounts Receivable = Accounts Receivable 2019 / Accounts Receivable 2015 * 100

Accounts Receivable = $18,100 / $9,000 * 100

Accounts Receivable = 201.11%

2018:

Accounts Receivable = Accounts Receivable 2018 / Accounts Receivable 2015 * 100

Accounts Receivable = $17,300 / $9,000 * 100

Accounts Receivable = 192.22%

2017:

Accounts Receivable = Accounts Receivable 2017 / Accounts Receivable 2015 * 100

Accounts Receivable = $16,400 / $9,000 * 100

Accounts Receivable = 182.22%

2016:

Accounts Receivable = Accounts Receivable 2016 / Accounts Receivable 2015 * 100

Accounts Receivable = $15,200 / $9,000 * 100

Accounts Receivable = 168.89%

8 0

3 years ago

Why should a heart surgeon earn more than a mcdonalds employee?

tatuchka [14]

Because a heart surgeon has spent a lot of money learning how to be a heart surgeon while a mcdonalds' employee does not require much education to be a mcdonalds' employee.Plus,a heart surgeon has to be responsible if the patient he operates on passes away after the operation that he has done.

4 0

3 years ago