What was the purpose of President Kennedy's Rice Stadium Moon Speech?

WILL GIVE BRAINLEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sindrei [870]

Answer:

I think, in some ways, the author does. However, becasue there is no real opposition that the author lays out, and because of other reasons, I don't think this is a valid arguent. For a more in-depth analysis, read the explanation.

Explanation:

It hosestly depends on what you would consider the 'other side' of this debate, and what would constitue as a valid argument. If you are looking at the viewpoint of "Yes, this is a valid argument," then these examples and opinions make sense.

A) "Teenagers can learn from having to maintain a vehicle." Yes! Teenagers learn via doing. Not everyone is a visual learner.

B) "...responsible drivers have the wide-open road in front of them and endless opportunitites." Well, I wouldn't word this using endless, per se, but sure. Responsible drivers don't need monitoring. I can get behind that.

C) Read the third Paragraph. Boom! A whole lot of explanation for yeah! Sure! Valid!

If you are looking at the viewpoint of "No, this is not a valid argument," then these examples and opinions make sense.

A) There is a slight Slippery Slope fallacy hidden in this argument. Paragraph four says this: "This lesson can carry over into school, work and pesonal life." While this could be true, the sentiment right before it is part of a Slippery Slope fallacy--or just about. There are many reasons to be responsible, and not being allowed to drive at 15 will not crash a student's entire life.

B) In P. 5, yes. Maturity certainly determines if one is 'old' enough to drive. However, how does one measure maturity? There is no test. That's why the legal driving age is 16, just in case some one isn't mature enough to drive without an adult in the car with them.

C) "Those who are not responsibel enough..." Yes, punishment in this context does what? Doesn't let them drive, sure. How do you...enact that into law? 'Oh, if we don't deem you mature enough you will get your liscense revoked. WE determinte if you are mature enough.' That certainly sounds like it would be abused.

D) The very last sentence is very...affronting. It tells me what not to do. People don't like being told what to do or not do, they like to form opinions and act on them. You can purseude them, but outwardly telling them 'Don't do this' will throw any valid argument out of the window.

7 0

4 years ago

Which word best identifies the conjunctive adverb in the sentence?

Vinvika [58]

Furthermore (c) best identifies the conjunctive adverb in the sentence.

Explanation

Conjunctions are basically those words which joins one sentence with the other part of the same sentence or in other words we can call it joining words, however, when an adverb joins one sentence with the other part of the same sentence that becomes conjunctive adverb.
Conjunctive adverb joins two clauses, parts of the same sentence to give it a proper meaning. It is also called adverbial conjunction or subordinating conjunction examples include, therefore, furthermore, thus, however, finally, meanwhile, nevertheless, still and so on.
In the given sentence, Its not fair to expect her to do all of the work; she doesn't have time for it! , the word furthermore is the conjunctive adverb since it is connecting the first part of the sentence with the second part of the sentence i.e, the clause with the usage of the word "furthermore". It needs to remembered that semi- colon should be added before the usage of conjunctive adverbs.The other options don't fit in and are suitable to be considered as conjunctive adverb in the sentence. Doesn't is not a conjunctive adverb because its only contracted form of does and not which gives doesn't. Fair is also not conjunctive adverb since the word fair is simple adjective. Option D which is expect is also not correct because its a verb and hence cannot be categorized under conjunctive adverb.