Answer:
The Farmers Alliance was an organized agrarian economic movement among American farmers that developed and flourished ca. 1875.
The United States wasnt able to solve the slavery crisis since many of its states economies relied on the use of slaves and America was already in debt and had trouble establishing a succesful form of taxation so it made compensation difficult and would collapse the economy at the time
Answer: Believed that the free market assured personal freedom
Explanation:
Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) was founded in 1960. The purpose of the organisation is to advocate public policies consistent with the Sharon Statement, which was adopted by young conservatives at a meeting at the home of William F. Buckley in Sharon, Connecticut, on September 11, 1960. The Sharon statement states that "Individual freedom and the right of governing originate with God. Political freedom is impossible without economic freedom. Limited government and strict interpretation of the Constitution. The free market system is preferable over all others."
Based on the above information, we can safely conclude that the whole purpose of the Young Americans for freedom is to advocate for a free market economy which will in turn guarantee individual freedom.
Answer:
He was betrayed by Napoleon.
He was betrayed by his own troops.
Explanation:
Toussaint L'Ouverture led a revolt with uniting rebels and won in getting over the colony by pushing out the Whites and French Troops. Touissant L'Ouverture also appreciated as 'The Black Napoleon', because of uprising revolt, which directed to the decline of slavery.
Answer: Socialism
Explanation:
Socialism, understood as the concern for a society that suppresses inequalities between men, is an idea that can be found in the remote past of Universal History. However, socialism, as it is generally understood today, enters the stage of history only in the mid-eighteenth century, with the work of Karl Marx.
In practice, this has always meant using state power to force a new lifestyle on people. It also meant that since the laws of economics could not be repealed, the more socialism was applied, the more the standard of living sank. On the other side of this equation, we have capitalism, where businesses operate in free markets. Where markets are relatively free, the standard of living of the population is higher, and the greater is economic growth.
On the other hand, two hundred years after the birth of Marx, with each new failure inspired by Marxism, its supporters are obliged to resort to the same excuses as always, and with an air of originality. The only hope is that in 200 years they will have given up.
