Answer: Officially took over from the european community when the Maastricht Treaty took effect: European Union
Great Leap Forward, Cultural Revolution: China
One of the Baltic Republics formerly part of the U.S.S.R: Latvia
Apartheid was abolished there in the 1990s: South Africa
Its members are in the nations of Southeast Asia: ASEAN
Islam is the predominant religion of the nations of this region: Middle East
Explanation:
I just took the quiz and got this correct.
The correct answer is A) Colonial legislatures should be appointed by the King with the consent of Parliament.
You forgot to include the quotation. Without that information, we do not know what you are talking about.
However, doing some deep research, we can comment on the following.
A valid conclusion that can be drawn from this quotation is "Colonial legislatures should be appointed by the King with the consent of Parliament."
We are talking about Colonial America times, in which the King of England exerted too much power and control over the 13 colonies. One of that heavy taxation legislation was the Stamp Act of 1765.
The quotation that is missing in this question is:<em> "The only representatives of the people of these colonies are persons chosen therein by themselves; and that no taxes ever have been, or can be constitutionally imposed on them but by their respective legislatures."</em>
Read what to cover? And the choices got cut off.
To be honest all of these answers are wrong (for being the main reason)
<span>When in 1931 Japan invaded Manchuria, Great Britain and France, the only League members at the time with significant regional ‘clout’, proved unwilling and would perhaps in any case have been unable to impose effective sanctions on the aggressor. Next, in 1935, Italy invaded Abyssinia in whose fate no other great power had any direct interest. This, it was widely recognised, was the decisive test case for the League. For Great Britain and France clearly did on this occasion have the capacity to defeat Italy if matters came to an all-out war. But in neither London nor Paris was there sufficient support for the imposition of anything more vigorous than partial economic sanctions (which themselves were lifted in 1936). The British cabinet was satisfied that they could not risk the loss of even part of their fleet in a war with Italy at a time when their possessions in the Far East were thought to be menaced by Japan and when the US administration was seen to be hamstrung by congressional neutrality legislation. Similarly, the French held that war with Italy for the sake of Abyssinia would be quixotic at a time when all French forces were thought to be needed for a possible early showdown with Nazi Germany. Abyssinia was accordingly incorporated into the Italian empire in 1936. As a body for resisting international aggression the League had thus effectively perished. It continued to exist in a moribund condition until the end of the Second World War when it was formally replaced by the United Nations.
</span>
If this is multiple choice then just go with B)
They were not being hurt by the workers
