1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
choli [55]
3 years ago
15

What was the significance of the Pueblo Revolt

History
1 answer:
sashaice [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The successful revolt kept the Spanish out of New Mexico for 12 years, and established a different power dynamic upon their return. The Pueblo Revolt holds great historical significance because it helped ensure the survival of Pueblo cultural traditions, lands, languages, religions, and sovereignty.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The historical skill of corroboration involves:
aalyn [17]
<h2>branliest pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Answer:</h2>

making sure a conclusion is accurate by checking several sources

Explanation:

History is made with sources. A source is that which allows us to verify a historical fact. The traditional conception of history only considers the written text as a source. In fact the history of two parts is divided: Prehistory, before the written texts, and History, from the appearance of the writing. But, obviously, this is a reductionist vision of history. History is everything that happens since the appearance of humanity on Earth, whether there is text or not. The Annales school will deny the written document as the undisputed and maximum source of historical knowledge. Any realization that starts from human activity will be a source.

Sources, then, are considered to be written texts, archeology, oral traditions, art, etc. Everything that humanity has produced and everything that can give us information about the past. Evidently, the written sources are the most used: stories, letters, statistics, literature, registers, files, toponymy, etc. The document par excellence is the legal text, but this is interested, since it leaves evidence of what matters to who has the power. A History book is not a historical source, since it is a book that already interprets the documents; although it can be a source for the History of historiography.

The biggest problem the historian faces is how to know the facts of the past. For this we must look for testimonies that tell us, sources that are often scattered. But once located can not be believed without more, it is necessary to verify its authenticity, its veracity, what in the document is ornament, if there are concealments, etc. The preserved documents do not speak of what interests us, but of what interests those who make them. Therefore, certain facts can be very few documents, while others exist countless data, which is necessary to make a process of selecting the documents, the Heuristic.

The fundamental problem is to determine the degree of reliability of the source, especially if it is written. You have to determine its authenticity, know its origin (which may be interested), know the degree of credibility and make a critique of it. But, once the source has been studied and understood, it is not enough to publish the fact, it is necessary to interpret it and elaborate historical knowledge.

4 0
3 years ago
Around 1900, about 80 percent of Russians worked as
Ugo [173]
At the time, Most russians were 3. farmers in poverty. God bless <3
7 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the limitations of Progressivism?
Eddi Din [679]
<span>Good Morning!
 
One of the major flaws of progressivism was its inability to deal with the breakdown of monopolies and business arrangements that benefited only the capitalists who coordinated large corporations. The competition was fading to the few and the big businessmen made rivers of money at the expense of the people.
 
</span><span>Progressives expressed little interest in trustbusting.

</span>Hugs!
6 0
3 years ago
How did the Union blockade of the southern coast affect the Confederacy?
aalyn [17]

Answer:

C. It encouraged European countries to trade with the South.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Part B Look again at the last sentence of the excerpt. In your own words, explain briefly what you think this sentence means.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

"A hospital alone shows what war is."

This sentence lets the reader be witness of the war cruelty and its consequences regarding human casualties. While being at hospitals you become aware of the war atrocities. It helps us to reflect that any war leads societies to suffering from death and destruction. No matter what the victims' race, sex, origin or religion are, what should be really important is that human beings are being devastated for those acts of cruelty, despotism and barbarism.

Explanation:

im not sure change it up though

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which constitutional amendent passed as a dircet result of the civil war
    8·1 answer
  • Which Supreme Court ruling caused schools to start integrating in the 1950s?
    13·1 answer
  • Why are the Articles of Confederation historically important? ( I know that it is either C or E because the rest of the choices
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the roman goverments attitude toward the early christians
    7·1 answer
  • How was the Supreme Court ensured that states do not deny basic rights to the people
    9·1 answer
  • How did the spread of nationalism impact Japan during the 19th century?
    13·1 answer
  • 2) name and explain 5 causes of the CUBAN REVOLUTION
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the Ottomans attack Constantinople?
    13·1 answer
  • How did Saladin become the leader of the Muslims?
    10·1 answer
  • Four of the Jim Crow laws passed in the South
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!