Introduction
After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values."
The correct answer is the following: <u>option D. After the British decided to end their mandate in the Palestine region, The United Nations voted to divide Palestine into two states, one Arab and one Jewish.</u> On November 29th of 1947, The United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution in which Palestine was called to be divided between Arabs and Jews.
The plan proposed by the UN, partitioned Palestine in 3 Jewish sections, 4 Arab sections and the internationally administered city of Jerusalem. The voting went 33-13 in favor of the partition, having all of the Arab Nations walkout of the voting, as a sign of protest. Six months later, on May 14th, 1948, Jewish leaders formed the State of Israel.
The North Vietnamese military (also known as the Vietcong) tactics made it difficult for the United States to defeat them because:
A) They did not wear uniforms- This made it challenging for the United States military to differentiate between who was a citizen and who was a member of the Vietcong.
B) Ambush/Hit and run style of fighting- This military style of fighting can be seen as unpredictable and random. This makes it so that the US military has to be on high alert at all times.
Answer:
Explanation:
It could be the enlightenment.
