Two types of argument would be a non-emergency argument meaning it does not really count, it will be over later. And the seccond argument would be a emergency argument meaning it would actually count towards something. The emergency argument is more important
To convince his audience to trust Christ.
"On Individuality" is chapter 3 in J. S. Mill's book "On Liberty". In it, Mill discusses - even though he does not define - individuality and how happiness and achievement of superior pleasures come from it. Conformity to customs could cost a person's joy in living and his/her freedom of thought.
Individuality is directly connected to liberal democracy in the sense that such form of government allows for it to be practiced. Both ideas walk hand in hand. If a person seeks individuality, he/she is striving to think and believe whatever he/she chooses right and proper, or even most profitable. Other forms of government - such as monarchy or aristocracy -, tend to limit or, on occasion, even erase the possibility of self-expression.
It is Mill's opinion that participation in a democracy cultivates the character of the citizens. And cultivation of character is a possible definition of the word individuality. Individuality is achieved when a person is able to see him/herself respected, his/her ideas heard, even if not accepted. The necessary freedom for a person to do that - to think, talk and act on his/her own terms - comes with democracy.
Answer:go to gramarly and sign up
Explanation:
I would say, that people care more about whether their leader fits the group, than about "leadership traits", because while leadership traits are very important, if the leader doesn't fit the group, then how will you be able to get things done? The reason why groups are able to get along, and make more progress on what they're working on, is because of the way that the group collaborates well with the leader.
