I think the correct answer would be the third option. The reason that the author provides is very irrelevant. Although it discusses a fact, the facts stated are very far off the topic and does not support the claim. The author was just stating numbers and statistics of how many were put into jail due to the use of performance-enhancing drugs. It does not say anything on why they should be sentenced to prison. It would be best if the author would write support regarding on the effects of the use of these drugs and how it would affect the athletes and the particular game. It would instead say something and convince the readers why using of these drug is punishable.
<em>Fallacy of oversimplification is also known as Fallacy of Reduction or "Reductive fallacy". </em>
<em>This fallacy is a type of faulty reasoning that involves a faulty causation, it is either about the reduction of a certain effect to a minimum of causes or reducing a complex array of causes to a single one, that cannot take account for all the effects of it or for it at all. </em>
<em>Example: “P1. Poverty is linked to causes of crime.</em>
<em>C. Therefore, if we eradicate poverty, we will eradicate crime.”</em>
I would go with C because a prologue is used to introduce things before the actual story to relate. Hope I helped! (:
You should read and get inspiration
<span>a word, letter, or number placed before another. (noun)
or
</span><span>add (something) at the beginning as a prefix or introduction.(verb)</span>