1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PIT_PIT [208]
2 years ago
14

which of the following were results of the korean war? select three options. loss of millions of lives easing of tensions in reg

ion greater us concern about the spread of communism end of communism in korea unification of korean peninsula tension between north korea and the united states
History
1 answer:
daser333 [38]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct answer choices are:

Loss of millions of lives

Greater US concern about the spread of communism

Tension between North Korea and the United States

You might be interested in
What are arguments that support the annexation of Hawaii?
Tju [1.3M]

America's annexation of Hawaii in 1898 extended U.S. territory into the Pacific and highlighted resulted from economic integration and the rise of the United States as a Pacific power. For most of the 1800s, leaders in Washington were concerned that Hawaii might become part of a European nation's empire. During the 1830s, Britain and France forced Hawaii to accept treaties giving them economic privileges. In 1842, Secretary of State Daniel Webster sent a letter to Hawaiian agents in Washington affirming U.S. interests in Hawaii and opposing annexation by any other nation. He also proposed to Great Britain and France that no nation should seek special privileges or engage in further colonization of the islands. In 1849, the United States and Hawaii concluded a treaty of friendship that served as the basis of official relations between the parties.

A key provisioning spot for American whaling ships, fertile ground for American protestant missionaries, and a new source of sugar cane production, Hawaii's economy became increasingly integrated with the United States. An 1875 trade reciprocity treaty further linked the two countries and U.S. sugar plantation owners from the United States came to dominate the economy and politics of the islands. When Queen Liliuokalani moved to establish a stronger monarchy, Americans under the leadership of Samuel Dole deposed her in 1893. The planters' belief that a coup and annexation by the United States would remove the threat of a devastating tariff on their sugar also spurred them to action. The administration of President Benjamin Harrison encouraged the takeover, and dispatched sailors from the USS Boston to the islands to surround the royal palace. The U.S. minister to Hawaii, Joh

Dole sent a delegation to Washington in 1894 seeking annexation, but the new President, Grover Cleveland, opposed annexation and tried to restore the Queen. Dole declared Hawaii an independent republic. Spurred by the nationalism aroused by the Spanish-American War, the United States annexed Hawaii in 1898 at the urging of President William McKinley. Hawaii was made a territory in 1900, and Dole became its first governor. Racial attitudes and party politics in the United States deferred statehood until a bipartisan compromise linked Hawaii's status to Alaska, and both became states in 1959.

n L. Stevens, worked closely with the new government.

 

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
India's Ganges River, a vital natural resource, is thought to be seriously contaminated. Why has the government been slow in cle
padilas [110]
There are a variety of reasons due to which the government has been slow in the cleanup efforts of the India’s Ganges River, which is a vital natural resource and is thought to be highly contaminated. Firstly the people of India believe that the Ganges is a holy river and it cannot be contaminated. Secondly with several industries coming up around the river banks the government is completely at fault for not committing themselves towards the cleaning of this holy river.


3 0
3 years ago
In what way was the Massachusetts Bay Company different from other charters? A.They were free of royal supervision.
liraira [26]

The answer is: A. They were free of royal supervision

This mean that the people in Massachusetts bay company able to create their own government along with the regulations that approved by the people who live in its territory.

Each year, the people in Massachusetts bay can select their own leader through elections. But the only candidates that can enter the election shall be a 'Free Man' (no women or slaves allowed)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the difference between an indirect democracy and a direct democracy.
erastovalidia [21]
A direct democracy is when citizens have a direct role in the government and are allowed to vote and propose laws. An indirect democracy is when citizens elect a representative who votes on laws on the behalf of the people.

Hope this helps!
3 0
3 years ago
Which mean of communication allows two way communication between the policy makers
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
Two way communication
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do you think about the american colonization society's plan to return free african americans to liberia?
    13·1 answer
  • The federal reserve system was created to
    6·2 answers
  • How did Qin Shi Huang unite the country of China
    5·1 answer
  • What are the reasons why Canada was created​
    11·1 answer
  • Why did people migrate from rural to urban areas
    7·2 answers
  • Pls help I didn't get to watch the instructions so I can't figure it out ​
    11·1 answer
  • The United States is a member of the_______to work with other nations to protect European and North American nations
    14·1 answer
  • WHAT RELIGION THAT RISE OR ORIGINATED IN SOUTH ASIA
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about language in canada is true
    10·1 answer
  • Someone plsss help me with this I will make you brain
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!