Everyone would be treated same and have the same amount of work.
I'm not sure if you're looking for a specific answer, but in my perspective...
They are similar in that they <em>introduce </em>a particular topic. Usually both <em>establish </em>the "playing field" the topic will be discussed on. This included boundaries and opinions etc.
They are different in that argumentative thesis statements are <em>one sided </em>and the it's purpose is to <em>defend</em> their argument. They usually begin by introducing a dispute or a question and <u>establishing their position</u>/what they believe.
Explanatory thesis statements usually<u> lay down the foundation for discussion</u> and introduce in <em>detail </em>what the reader and author will ponder. They <em>explain.</em>
Answer:
There were a couple of reasons for moving to the southern colonies. The first would be that they were loosing in the North and wanted to try and pierce the South to get ports and some ground to wage war.
They also believed that many slaves would embrace their liberation and join their cause against their former masters.
If they captured the South ports they could transport troops and equipment a lot quicker and easier from the British West Indies.
And they thought that there were more loyalists in the South and that would mean more domestic manpower for holding the lines.
Justinian conquered the Italian peninsula, parts of Spain and parts of Africa
The reason the north wanted to end slavery was because they saw the flaw in it. At this point the U.S. was one of the only countries still using slavery. Slavery was the south’s main economic income. 95% to 98% of all goods produced in the south were made by slaves ( textiles and farming). so the south was willing to split into another country to be able to keep their slaves.
