Hi there. The way this question is stated is going to need some input from you to infer what was meant by the language.
This answer would be True. Because opportunity cost means more of one and less of another in simple terms, since in an economy we cannot utilize all of our resources at one time.
But I would caution that the language is in the simplest of terms! Since a more thorough definition would be that opportunity cost is the amount lost by not taking the next-best alternative. If your teacher and lesson usually describe opportunity cost and other terms simply, then I would say to go for it and choose True.
But if your lesson seems to be strict on definitions, then maybe that isn't the best definition. I would say it is good enough though because although simple, it does encompass the whole idea.
I hope this helps!
The US proved that it had the industrial strength and man power to become a world power
Well the cause of a certain event in history will mean something happens.
The effect is the result of the event happening
For example. With 9/11 the cause was the twin towers collapsing. The effect would have been thousands of people dying as the result of the planes being highjacked
what is this question
sorry give more information
Adolf Hitlers he is a German politician that who is a leader of the Nazi Party, he was born in April 20, 1889, and he died at April 30, 1945.
