Answer:
Defendant
Explanation:
In the case of your question, the answer is the defendant. However, the place where the trial is held is usually the place where the crime was committed. But usually, that's also the place where the defendant lives. It just depends. But yeah your answer is defendent.
Answer:
In no less than 200-words, describe how you would craft a new policy that allowed officers to determine if individuals were plotting terrorist acts or carrying concealed weapons.
Explanation:
Significantly, a person holding a state-issued permit allowing the person to acquire or possess firearms (e.g., a concealed weapons permit) is not required to undergo a background check if the permit was issued: (1) within the previous five years in the state in which the transfer is to take place; and (2) after an authorized government official has conducted a background investigation to verify that possession of a firearm would not be unlawful.13 Permits issued after November 30, 1998 qualify as exempt only if the approval process included a NICS check.14
Answer:
Repeated unwanted contact that communicates a threat is called STALKING.
Explanation:
Stalking is said to occur when an individual, who has no reason to contact one, begins to monitor and follow one around. This situation is also called HARASSMENT. It involves continuous bothering of another person, even after the person has indicated that he will prefer to be left alone.
Stalking usually makes one to be afraid and to feel unsafe. Stalking can involve individuals, families or friends.
Stalking is a criminal offence that is punishable under law and anyone who is experiencing such have to report the case to the nearest police station.
Stalking behaviors include: constant communication through phone calling, internet or texts, constant following, constant watching of one's house, leaving threatening messages, etc.
Answer:The police must administer an intelligence test to the suspect to determine if he or she really does understand the rights. The police must make another attempt to explain the suspect’s rights before beginning the interrogation. The police are now free to interrogate the suspect. The police must determine why the suspect does not understand his or her rights as they have been explained.
Explanation:
Credit:allanswers.com
