Answer:
<em>The correct option is C) Evaluating the argument and forming a conclusion based on the evidence.</em>
Explanation:
An important step in critical thinking is evaluating the argument being made. The claim put forward by Sarah has no evidence and is a general statement made by Wikipedia. Of course, the emotions of every person present on Earth cannot be surveyed and the claim is made without proper evidence.
Jake's claim is based on evaluation of the argument and lack of evidence by Sarah and hence, it is an element of critical thinking.
When considering the behavior of birds, the response of opening the mouth when presented with a dangling worm is an example of "Innate behavior".
<h3>What do you mean by Innate Behavior?</h3>
Firstly, the term behavior is define as the way through which the particular person act with others. This can be positive or a negative.
Adding to it, Innate behavior is defined as the behavior that is developmentally fixed. This type of behavior is controlled by genetics. The results of this type of behavior is automatic without any prior experience.
The behavior that this shown in given scenario shows is innate, it is because it is already natural process of the way like how the baby birds responds and because they were asking or have the thought of having food as now that they saw their mother.
It is considered as the natural way to speaking with the mother when baby birds see her because they want food to eat.
Most of the birds' movements are considered as the innate because they are genetically programmed. Their behavior is based upon the particular or given stimuli. A stimuli or situation here means anything that impact on the working of organism to react.
Learn more about Innate behavior, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/12792340
#SPJ4
The answer is: his study does not qualify as an experiment. For the study to be an experiment, Dr. Kline would have to manipulate the independent variable in a group (for example, apply a certain treatment) and also have a control group to which he doesn’t apply such treatment.
In this case, the study is an observational study because he only observed the subjects that were in the zoo that morning and measured the variable of his interest, that is the environmental attitude of the visitors, he did not apply a certain treatment to the group nor manipulate any variable.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest in need it
