Answer:
it would be 70
Step-by-step explanation:
you are not stupid
I tried googling to get an answer and found some solutions on yahoo: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070327061938AAi6tJx
They are explained pretty well
Answer:
50h(5h-2)
Step-by-step explanation:
Factor out 50h from the expression
To find for the composite function of calories burned while
swimming flippers using the two given functions, all we have to do is to plug
in the function of c (t) to the function b (c). By doing this combination, we
can create a function in the form of b [c (t)].
We are given the 2 functions:
c
(t) = 704 t
b
(c) = 1.3 c
To
solve this, just simply combine the 2 but combine c (t) to b(c) since we are
looking for the composite function of calories burned while swimming with
flippers. Not b (c) to c (t).
b
[c (t)] = 1.3 (704 t)
b
[c (t)] = 915.2 t
Answer:
<span>b
[c (t)] = 915.2 t</span>
Answer: Mike's arm span is 7.165 cm longer than the George's one.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have that the association between height and arm span is modeled by the equation
y = 4.5 + 0.977*x
where y is height and x is arm span.
Mike is 172 cm tall, so his arm span is:
172cm = 4.5 + 0.977*x
x = (172 - 4.5)/0.977 = 171.443 cm
and George is 165 cm tall, so his arm span is:
x = (165 - 4.5)/0.977 = 164.278 cm
Then the difference between their arm span is:
171.443cm - 164.278cm = 7.165 cm
So Mike's arm span is 7.165 cm longer than the George's one.
