Answer:
Consumers should not buy from companies that don't source materials
Explanation:
Companies should never have an excuse for not sourcing for their materials responsively and responsibly. They owe an ethical responsibility as well as a duty to offer their customers qualitative products at the best price and that is most sustainable to the environment.In recent times, through the widespread use of social media and the instrument of investigative journalism, it has been able to bring to the surface, the less than responsible activities of many companies in sourcing for their interest of the public and the environment.The 2006 movie "Blood Diamond" shows an avid description of how diamonds are mined and traded in the war-torn country of Sierra Leonne depicting the violation of Human and Child rights and how is excessively enriched diamond suppliers and companies.It is clear that many companies despite the public outcry for transparency in revealing their supply chain in sourcing for their materials still chose unorthodox practices. It therefore, falls on the consumers to spend their money responsibly and make smart and credible choices with their finances by refusing to buy from companies that are not transparent with their source materials.Consumers are the life-wire of any business and the hope of any business survival rests majorly on consumer satisfaction. Researches have shown that companies are no being accountable with the natural resources are utilized and have been used to cause serious harm to people and the environment. Since the companies manage to evade adequate regulations and responsibilities, it falls on the consumers to ensure that their money serves them to the greatest value.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Mediations.
Explanation:
Mediations are alternative methods to solve conflicts that have the inherent goal of reaching an integral solution of the conflict for the parties involved avoiding to take the problem to court. During the mediation, the parties involved express their demands and a mediator comes to the best conclusion that benefits the parties as equal as possible.
<span>The second team is currently in the requirements phase of their project. In this phase, the team would plan and spell out exactly what is required of the system that they are constructing. This phase comes with heavy input from stakeholders who help define the scope and nature of the project.</span>
Claims that drop-out rate has increased because more women have taken jobs in the workplace is an example of false cause fallacy.
A false cause fallacy is said to occur in a statement because the link between the premises and conclusion does not even exist.
Here, phrase one is "high school drop-out rate has increased" and phrase two is <em>"because </em><em>more women </em><em>have </em><em>taken jobs </em><em>in the workplace"</em>
<em />
If we assess the two phrase, we will observe that their is no link between the statement to facilitate a valid conclusion because when woman taking jobs in workplaces can not result to increase in drop rate in high school.
Therefore, it is an example of false cause fallacy.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/6987057</em>
Answer:A
Explanation:
The high rate of inflation in Mexico would increase its citizens purchasing power.
