The given statement is False. Baker, Schultz, and Halstead argue that the United States can reap significant strategic and economic benefits by investing in cleaner energy technologies and supporting international efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
Carbon emissions are the primary cause of global climate change. It is widely acknowledged that in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change, the world must urgently reduce emissions. However, how this responsibility is distributed among regions, countries, and individuals has long been a source of contention in international discussions.
This debate stems from the various ways emissions are compared, including annual emissions by country, emissions per person, historical contributions, and whether or not they account for traded goods and services. These metrics can tell a variety of stories.
To know more about carbon emissions here-
brainly.com/question/1301348
#SPJ4
I would have to say gathering information since she’s gathering information about the training programs.
Weighing the pros and cons would be listing the good things and bad things about this job.
If she is reflecting, she is thinking about her decision.
She is not taking action since she is only researching, she has not actually started the job.
Hope this helps :)
Use less plastic, recycle, reuse, clean water
