Answer:
least imperfect and most republican of the state constitutions
The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
Answer:
It's Union
Explanation:
The Union was the northern cluster of states that wanted to stay with the United States during the Civil War. What we now call the South would be considered the Confederacy, which wanted to leave the United States and be on their own for many different reasons including taxes and slavery. Hope that helped, I'm not good and explaining things.
Answer:
It meant that the cost of food and other items increased.
Explanation:
While most of the fighting didn't occur in the north, or the Union, because it mostly happened on the border of the Union and the Confederates, or in the south (Confederate States) themselves, the Union thrived in inflation
I think the answer would be reassure white american settlers that the frontier was safe and peaceful.
Hope this helps
